[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Isn't there something *else* going on here as well? Namely, why does > libc6-dev suddenly want kernel-headers, and a particular version at > that, when neither it nor libc5-dev ever did before (and for > good reasons?) This was recently discussed. It's so that it doesn't have to contain a huge patch that is essentially what the kernel-headers package is. Also, that's why it wants a certain (known-good) version, of course. MfG Kai -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
