Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, basic system library structures, and so on form the ABI for a given tuple that I was giving examples of not what the upstream gcc folks were looking for? I'm not sure I understand the point of your question. Ah, maybe this is where we are talking past each other: I read this as a request to pin down and document the definition of each multiarch tuple. Perhaps you read it as a request to pin down and document the definition of the term "multiarch tuple", without necessarily pinning down the details for each arch. It would certainly be useful to clarify which is needed before deciding which to spend time on, so thanks for asking. Matthias? Thanks for a useful clarification. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120319143423.GA11180@burratino
