On 10/04/12 10:53, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I wholeheartedly agree. > I also agree that wheezy would be the correct moment to do it, and > that we shouldn't wait until wheezy+1.
I was hesitant to suggest that investing energy into improving the current init system, if it is likely to be wholesale replaced, might not be worthwhile (when that same energy could be put into hastening the inevitable). However the release time frame issue is key here. sysvinit is not going away for wheezy; but this improvement might be possible. -- Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
