Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:13:09PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: >> As a side note I have a use case at work where static order seems to be >> needed. We build boot images for network boot of clusters. During boot >> additional files can be copied from NFS into the system including boot >> scripts. When using dependency based boot order the numbers for boot >> scripts change a lot depending on the boot image (include support for >> lustre, ha, slurm, ... and each gets a different order). That makes it >> impossible (or at least a lot harder) to copy in the same generic boot >> scripts from NFS into different images since the name needs to be >> different for each case. The boot scripts would have to be reordered >> during boot. > > So do your boot scripts declare the correct dependency information > in the LSB header? With dependency based boot, the numbers are > meaningless other than for ordering. The fact that they change is > to be expected. Are you running insserv to update the ordering?
I'm not running insserv at boot. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gxdpge6.fsf@frosties.localnet