Chris Knadle <chris.kna...@coredump.us> writes: > I think the above is reasonable and fits the Debian "do-acracy" > methodology.
> At the same time, I also understand that this is a tough call to make. > Removing the current maintainer if they're not totally MIA may not seem > right -- it may feel "heavy-handed". Perhaps in these cases, adding an > additional maintainer that is currently working on the package(s) and > notifiying the current maintainer(s) that this has been done seems > reasonable. Well, I would almost always prefer that the package move to a multiuser VCS repository and become team-maintained than just be hijacked. If the maintainer isn't willing to do that either, my sympathy for their desire to stop further work until they have more time decreases further. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4vkej5a....@windlord.stanford.edu
