On 27 Dec 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 17 Dec 1997, James Troup wrote: > > [snip] > > > If the binary changes, the version number should change. > > > > Completely agreed. Everything else will only result in a big mess. > > > > I'll check our how I can make policy more clearly on this point and > > include something in the next policy weekly posting. > > Of course, are you talking about the binary program, or the binary > .deb? > > The binary program in question *did not change*, because its > compilation and linkage environment's (effectively) did not. > > The *only* think that changed here was the dependency in the .deb. > > Just a twist to consider.
By changing the dependencies you changed the source package before, or? With that, you'll have to use a new version number anyways. > Anyway, I guess I didn't mean to start a big debate---I was pretty > much convinced after Sven first mailed me that I probably ought to > have bumped the version number. I just thought the policy should also > be more explicit. Agreed. (That's why we should continue the discussion until we have a consensus.) Thanks, Chris -- Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA CS Software goes online! Visit our new home page at http://www.schwarz-online.com -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .