On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:04:32PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 04/30/2012 04:56 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote: > >> I agree that OpenRC would be an improvement over the status > >> quo, but migrating *away* from OpenRC later on would be a major pain > >> as we would have to support both LSB/sysvinit scripts and OpenRC > >> service descriptions for the foreseeable future. > >> > > Ah? Is this any different with other alternatives like > > upstart or systemd? > > Yes. The kernel isn't getting any less event-based, so OpenRC would be > an interim solution.
Unless OpenRC itself could become more event-based. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120430155009.gl28...@codelibre.net
