Do you mean bo or hamm? I do not have a problem with libc5 on my hamm machine. And I don't know what's the problem with libc5-dev especially why it should be in hamm.
Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44 Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Schulze [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 02, 1998 12:41 AM > To: Meskes, Michael > Subject: Re: Looking for a reason to not orphan my howto > Importance: High > > On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote: > > libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm? > > > > IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're > close > > to completing hamm. > > No it's not. If we don't have a working libc5 for hamm people > can't upgrade. This would break the whole debian philosopy. > > Regards > > Joey > > -- > / Martin Schulze * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 26129 Oldenburg / > / Erfahrung ist eine nützliche Sache / > / Leider macht man sie immer erst kurz nachdem man sie brauchte / << > File: ATT00075.ATT >> -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
