Roger Leigh wrote: > I did want to have this for wheezy (#633299). But I lacked the time > and familiarity with the d-i code, and the d-i developers also have > higher priorities.
Personally, this d-i developer has as one priority that the system d-i installs be broadly useful. d-i has at times needed to frob files in /etc to achieve this goal, and I have not ruled out the possibility that it might need to do so again... -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature