On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:25:42 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Wouldn't the ideal solution be non-architecture-specific changelogs?
No, that would be very much non-ideal. One should be able to schedule binNMUs for a subset of archs, and one shouldn't have to look up whether a package builds m-a:same binaries. This has been said a few times already, please drop this thread if you're just going to repeat old shot-down ideas. Thanks, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120614170704.gz12...@radis.cristau.org
