* Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org>, 2012-06-23, 12:33:
reading DEP 8's appendix, I wonder about the necessity to keep separate
Restrictions and Features fields. For instance, the no-build-needed
Feature could also be a needs-build restriction.
I noticed this only today:
| autopkgtest (2.0.0) unstable; urgency=medium
|
| * Incompatible test declaration spec changes:
| - no-build-needed is now the default; build-needed is a Restriction
| that tests which need it have to declare.
Apparently http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/ is not being kept
up-to-date. :|
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120625131556.ga9...@jwilk.net
