On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:47:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > That said, there was this bug report saying "We'll RM celt anytime soon, > > so don't use it anymore" and that's it. > Surely you were aware that CELT was experimental and this was due > to happen?
Yep. And upstream code is cluttered with #if CELT_0_5 #elif CELT_0_7 #else #endif so I appreciate the arrival of opus. > CELT never had a stable bitstream format, so this sort of codec > compatibility issue could occur even if all parties had some version > of it. > > It's now dead upstream, and support for any version of CELT would have > become less and less useful during the lifetime of wheezy. Nothing to argue with that, that's why I dropped CELT support immediately. Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627185729.gw6...@ltw.loris.tv
