Too bad, a personal attack in the first (level of) answer already. On 2012-08-10 20:22, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > ... says the man who thinks multiarch should be held up indefinitely because > a perl reimplementation of apt should take precedence.
No, I don't think so. Neither of 'multiarch should be held up indefinitely', 'because' and 'a perl reimplementation of apt should take precedence'. I don't know where did you get what you wrote above from, but please refrain from publicly making further statements about what I think when these statements are not based on something I wrote myself. TIA. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++ GNU/Linux userspace developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120811080511.GC12900@r500-debian
