Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > It seems to me that the primary objection to the presence of these files > without source is that they are then distributed as part of Debian, in > the source package. That violates our social contract.
The counter-argument from affected maintainers is that we *do* have the source. It just happens to be in a different source package. We even know that, because when we build the binary package we use the version of the Javascript library derived from that other source package. There is therefore no *actual* violation of the social contract here, just an inadequacy of bookkeeping. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipc7ra6q....@windlord.stanford.edu