Hi. Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes:
> Le Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:31:35PM +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit : >> >> Again, in case you'd doubt it, RDF is just a model, which can be written >> in a number of different formats (not only XML), but the key here is the >> embedded identification of the reference of the ontologies/prefixes >> which render the documents self described and extensible, out of the >> box. >> >> Note that the same rationale stands for all metadata to be eventually >> published on the Web by Debian servers. > > Hi Olivier, > > I think that this is the key point: what is important is not the format, but > the ontology. Even in the absence of an implementation for the format, > we should make sure that new terms are not added in our control files without > having checked for prior art, and coordinate accordinlgy. On the other hand, there aren't much people working on such issues AFAICT, so we may just make choices and see if others have criticisms to make. For instance, on ADMS.SW, we're clearly ahead of the competition ;) > > Is there a simple web page that lists the terms of ADMS.SW ? > Yes, (if you read the pointers I've added in http://bugs.debian.org/685605 ;), at : https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/release/release100 Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bohwra5f....@inf-8657.int-evry.fr