Le lundi 24 septembre 2012 23:53:01, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > package X would depend on the maintainer field of the packages *already* > > in Debian, not the one in the package he uploads. Just the way it is at > > One way to read your "bonus points" would allow the DM to > upload a new package with the maintainer set to > pkg-haskell-maintainers. That can also be interpreted as allowing > the DM to upload/NMU any package as long as he sets the maintainer > field to pkg-haskell-maintainers. Hence it's not what was proposed. > > But I can also read it as a DD first needs to upload the package > with the maintainer field set to pkg-haskell-maintainers, and > from then on any DM in that group can upload that package. AFAIUI, that's the proposed change. > > > Kurt Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
