On 11/10/12 at 22:18 +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > > For myself, I'd feel a lot more comfortable with DDs seconding than DMs > seconding. > > In my mind, when you sign up to be a DM, you're signing up to do a good > job of maintaining one or more packages. > > In my mind a part of the additional commitment in agreeing to be a DD is > to think about the broader issues of the project, for example, the > social implications of your decision, to try and help build Debian as a > community and team. > I think that broader view is important when doing something that is > likely to have social consequences like an ITO. > > So, I would prefer DD seconds to DM seconds.
(Fully agreed.) Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121012150840.gc26...@xanadu.blop.info