On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:30:38AM -0700, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! > > Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> writes: > > Its for after wheezy, definitely. > > Also, there are some open issues to be solved for this to happen. > > The most important is being able to deal with arch all packages. And > > worse - arch all packages able to build only on certain architectures. > > But thats outside dak and my area. Goto the buildd/wanna-build people to > > help for that. > > Also remeber, there are packages like cmucl that can only be built by > the same upstream release of itself and can currently survive in Debian > because the maintainer can upload a bootstrapped binary package along > the source
So, you currently upload every arch with the sourceful upload? Or do you upload, wait for the buildd build-dep lock, and do a binary-only upload? I don't think anyone wants to get rid of binary-only uploads. Binary only uploads get rejected if there is no source package anyway, so it's pretty easy to still allow binary-only-uploads and strip a .deb on the sourceful upload. No reason to make this default, though. > > Regards > > Christoph > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871ugxgddd....@mitoraj.siccegge.de > -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature