Stuart Prescott writes ("Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's
packages"):
> I'm not suggesting that VAC status should be public information, but blanket
> statements that we know if maintainers are on VAC (or MIA or whatever) are
> wrong for 50% of our maintainers as are statements that potential salvagers
> have this information.
This is a good point. Another reason why the post-ITO waiting period
should be much longer than two weeks.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20623.63037.387949.829...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
