On 11/28/2012 07:17 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > >>> However, it's the opinion of the systemd >>> primary upstream authors that having /usr on a separate fs is a bad idea >>> since there are tools that (primarily) some udev rules use, which live >>> on /usr. >> Yeah, we all so his marvelous examples of software that >> would break. His first example is pulseaudio, which is one >> of the software he authors. Brilliant way of thinking, if you >> ask me. Like: one of my software is broken, therefor, I will >> do more breakage... > Please do not just cut out the information which is relevant to get your > point across.
Coming from you that's kind of nice to read this... :) > Picking only Pulse-Audio out of the many things he mentioned - most of them > not written by him - to prove that he takes also the full blame for that > situation is also a form of lying. > > If did a proper and fair argumentation, you'd have to admit that he is right > and it's not just about the things he wrote. It is truth that there's a general movement inside RedHat to fuck-up everything. You are right, I should have mention that more clearly : it's not only about Lennart and systemd guys, and I should take the blame for not highlighting that it's a more widespread non-sense! However, picking PulseAudio as an example of broken software by its author was a quite funny read, don't you think? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b62db9.8010...@debian.org
