2012/11/30 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:00:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: [...] >> Is it really not part of GNU? I see the URL being a subdomain of gnu.org: >> >> >> [...] >> >> * URL : http://health.gnu.org/ >> >> [...] >> >> And from their webpage: >> | Health is an official GNU package, part of the GNU System. All the >> | development is at : GNU Health project[1] at Savannah
Yes, GNU health is an official GNU package. > I think either > > gnu-health or gnuhealth > > would be a proper package name because it is just the name of the > project. We also do have gnumed-{server,client} packages because the > project ist named GNUmed. We just have to settle with a reasonable > name without space (and '_') and need to stick to lower case letters. gnuhealth is the one I prefer, closest to the official project name, and unlikely to get in conflict with other future packages (using "health" alone would be too generic) > BTW, the packaging in > > svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/gnuhealth/trunk/ > > has "gnuhealth" as package name. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > PS: Most probably it makes sense to let reportbug reject invalid package > names in ITP bugs. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de +Emilien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canqxmqglrfyzwsxg_un-bpmxlswym-3mewuqfqeepphbtqb...@mail.gmail.com