2013/1/10 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org>: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Nick Andrik wrote: > >> Recently I was trying to convert the debian/copyright file of a >> non-free package ( unrar-nonfree ) to 1.0 format. >> The main license of this software is non-free (mainly because it does >> not allow reverse engineering of the RAR algorithm) but it also >> includes parts of software distributed under other licenses >> (BSD/public domain/GPL/etc). > > unrar-nonfree can probably be removed from Debian now that we have unar?
We have unrar-nonfree that builds the binary package unrar and unrar-free that builds the binary package unrar-free. I guess you meant > unrar-nonfree can probably be removed from Debian now that we have unrar-free? This is a different issue which could be possibly discussed, but the question remains since we refer to the license of the license text, not the license itself (if I understand the issue well enough) Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANn5kOtjPa79UoHyFEuUW=ge=krarri8ehgn4prp09mnsux...@mail.gmail.com
