One of the most interesting statements in the recent udev
discussion was Steve Langasek's claim that socket-based
activation has "fundamentally unmaintainable security".
A couple people have asked for clarification and I would
also like to know what problem Steve was referring to.
Can someone please give me the golden clue?
-- 
Thomas Hood


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5110dcec.4010...@gmail.com

Reply via email to