On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote: > > One of the principles, up to now, of system design for the debian.org > > infrastructure has been that it can tolerate single nodes being off line > > for periods of time. My understanding of ZeroMQ is that it doesn't do > > very well when the sender and the receiver aren't on line at the same > > time. I have not used ZeroMQ in any serious way, so I'm only repeating > > what I've heard. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Well, as I understand it, when sender or receiver are not online, there > is simply no message passing. If your concern is about what happens to > the backlog when the consumer comes back online, then I've already > written about that earlier today :-)
Does that imply you expect us to run services on core infrastructure machines that listen to the world? Cheers, weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130425204936.gs23...@anguilla.noreply.org