Hi all, On Do 25 Apr 2013 22:29:53 CEST Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 25.04.2013 20:49, schrieb Mike Gabriel:Can this be a proposal? Package libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo using an alternatives setup and thus, making both libs installable in parallel. Packagers can then build-depend on one or the other libjpeg implementations.Please no. If libjpeg-turbo is the saner implementation, which reading through the messages posted so far it seems like, let's switch to it fully.
+1 from me, as well. I have been using the drop-in replacement packages that we provide via the upstream X2Go Debian-compatible package archive for months now and have not found any restraints, so far.
How can a consensus on this issue be reached? Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpchqwWbU3L9.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
