On 05/08/2013 06:30 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > # in unstable > Package: bar > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev (>= 1.5) > > The 'bar' maintainer intended to require the unstable version of > libfoo-dev, but in fact the dependency is satisfied from stable as > well. Yeah! And this mistake is very easy to make.
I did a similar "woopsie" recently myself with Breaks / Replaces, (which was quickly solved) even though I quite know what I was doing, simply because I forgot about the epoch. Of course, that made the Breaks / Replaces completely useless. Though, is there a way to fix human brains? I don't think so... Would having the epoch written in the generated file names solve the problem? I don't think so either... Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518b429e.7030...@debian.org
