On 28/05/13 18:53, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2013, Arno Töll wrote: >> Why not consider something light, better suited for most systems which >> need nothing but a sendmail binary which is suited to relay to a >> real(tm) mail-server and deliver local mail and does not involve lots >> of configuration and/or listening ports? > > nullmailer or similar can do this fairly well. You really only need to > have 1) configured the remote smart host 2) a remote e-mail address to > send all local mail to. >
We already (I believe) ship exim4-daemon-light as default MTA. I don't know how much lighter are the alternatives like dma or nullmailer. I tried both, and I ended going back to exim4-daemon-light because of the problems I had with them (#686164 #697871 and #329192). So I'm not sure if is worth the effort changing the default MTA. Does anybody recommend any light MTA other than this ones?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
