Le jeudi, 30 mai 2013 14.53:44, Florian Weimer a écrit : > * Didier Raboud: > > If we can't handle the backporting of serious security issues on top > > of our stable version (in order to maximise the avoidance of > > regressions), then maybe said software shouldn't be shipped in > > stable in the first place. Thoughts ? > > Which web browsers would remain in stable if we applied this criterion > consistently?
Although that makes me very sad, if we (collectively) give up packaging browser extensions (hence letting our users rely on third-party repositories to get access to [non-]free binaries) and frozen browsers in stable, then maybe the correct answer to your question is "none". OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305301520.29815.o...@debian.org
