On Wed, June 5, 2013 09:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : >> > Marcin Kulisz <deb...@kulisz.net> (02/06/2013): >> > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? >> > >> > Surely the .net part of it? >> >> If that's the reason, why do we have cdn.debian.net in the list of >> mirrors used in d-i? I'm not against either but would prefer to see the >> same standards apply to both solutions. > > Or, we could investigate whether one or the other could be made > official?
This could be excellent, because it could be used as the "sane default" where we now ask people questions or require additional configuration. We could make the mirror selection question in d-i priority low; remove or simplify this page http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/coreutils/download and replace ftp.de.debian.org (?) on this page http://packages.debian.org/sid/coreutils; add it as a better default than ftp.debian.org in debootstrap and ftp.jp.debian.org in pbuilder; and probably many more. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8471447b9225ca939c47d283f980797e.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl