Hi, > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > > > * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past > > > 14 days. > > > * If a bug is assigned to multiple packages, both packages will be > > > affected. > > > * The RC bug affects both unstable and testing. > > > * The affected package does not have any reverse dependencies in > > > testing. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > +1
I also like it, somewhat, but am also aware of this approach rendering unstable more stable than testing. I would prefer another kind of punishment for neglect / some difficulty than the mere removal. > > Please do not hesitate to remove leaf packages like mira > > in an automated manner. > > ... which does not mean that we (= Debian Med team) are not working on > it - we just did not managed to find a solution. I was not aware of it. And even that I am now, I do not have the time to address this within the next 14 days. So, hm, ... those 14 days are truly challenging. Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/trinity-ae369310-002e-4f23-9c9f-acfeeca278ba-1370441714196@3capp-gmx-bs01
