Adam Borowski wrote: > Wouldn't it be easier to have lib32gcc1:amd64 merely depend on libgcc1:i386? > It'd save a massive amount of complexity.
But that reintroduces the problem which convinced me there's a reason to keep lib32gcc1 in the first place: suppose libgcc1:i386 and libgcc1:amd64 get out of sync. That makes it impossible to autobuild gcc on the out-of-date architecture to correct the situation. (That's probably more of an issue on other slower architectures like mips/mipsel.) -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2939148.PGM52SdYmI@frobozz
