On 13/06/13 12:59, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:41:27PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> DFSG #4: Our priorities are our users and free software >> >> A court prosecuting/persecuting one of our users is not in scope > I'm now struggling to understand which side of the argument you are arguing. > >
Just that the user can make their own choice about whether they want to enable or disable privacy features and we shouldn't worry about the side-effects of those user decisions It is my preference to make such features more easily accessible or available by default, just like hashed passwords and other things that are generally considered healthy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51b9b483.3040...@pocock.com.au
