On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > So properly maintaining our stable/oldstable is a mandatory first step into > being > able to provide even longer support for random release we start to call the > LTS. > > Whether we achieve that by throwing more manpower into the bunch, or > splitting > the archive into KEY packages (as defined in recent d-d-a email) and non-KEY > packages, is different matter.
So that means my question/suggestion is valid even for the non-LTS case, doesn't it? Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130830105846.ga20...@feivel.credativ.lan
