On 27/11/13 11:49, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > Then I don't understand why on 'multiple' page they say sysvinit+openrc > is infeasible.
I was referring to the sysvinit program/package, which I think is made obsolete by OpenRC; the original SysV init scripts could still be used by OpenRC. It is infeasible for Debian to choose "sysvinit and OpenRC" as required-supported init systems (such that you could install either of these and get a working system). Because in that case, a package that chooses to provide a new OpenRC-style runscript, would still be required to maintain the original SysV init script, for sysvinit users, with no particular advantage of doing so. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5295f2c9....@pyro.eu.org
