On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>, 2014-01-03, 13:13: > >Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field > >(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the > >runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind? > > No, it just means that I gave up.
Oh, ok. :/ Personally I see it has similar drawbacks to the discarded Build-Options field that some people wanted to use to list support for build-arch/build-indep targets, the difference here is, that I can see it also being useful so that autopkgtest implementations don't take over the debian/tests/control pathname as the sole owners, and alternative implementations could use that file with different deb822 contents, for example. So, I guess I'll just go ahead and add the two line patch needed to recognize the field for 1.17.6; queued now locally for my next push. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140104154452.ga23...@gaara.hadrons.org
