On 02/10/2014 06:47 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > It is pretty ridiculous to me to consider the basic plumbing on the > system as replaceable as the thing that decides where on the screen my > shortcut to Google search for "lolcatz" goes.
I fully agree on that and other DDs already mentioned that in the ITP for OpenRC as well. Most users won't actually be able to tell what kind of init system they want, they just want a reliable, fast and secure solution. That's what should be kept in mind when making that decision. It's like being able to customize internal parts of your cars engine when ordering one from your dealer. Customers don't care who the manufacturer of your ignition system is as long it's the best possible one. (Yes, I know comparisons with cars are bad ;)). Neglecting reliability and maintainability for the sake of being able to choose such a core component is a bad idea. I do not think it's really feasible to maintain several init systems, it just affects too many components of the system. We don't even manage to maintain two versions of ffmpeg (the original and the fork) even though many users actually prefer the original. How should this even work with the init system then? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f91d5a.8060...@physik.fu-berlin.de