On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:45:05PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > > About a schedule: No, we do not currently have it. We should work on > > getting a plan for this. Now, it is not an easy task to get done, and > > as we might effectively end up locking out many DDs, I'm thinking (and > > I have not yet talked this over in the team, but we should discuss it) > > we should get formal support from the project in the form of a GR or > > something like that... Of course, that after sketching a real plan > > with stages and dates. > > Surely this is well within keyring-maint purview and a GR is thus > unnessecary? Running the plan by debian-project seems a reasonable > level of consultation.
We didn't need one for removing PGPv3 keys so I don't see why we'd need one for 1024D v4 keys. I have already suggested a timescale to -project but haven't seen any comments on it other than "you should script this" and "should we relax the requirement for 2 signatures". J. -- Minorities are the foundation of society. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140304053811.gh27...@earth.li
