On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:08:54AM -0500, Kevin Toppins wrote: > On 28 Mar 2014 03:40, Olav Vitters wrote: > [...] > > > I can tell you right now, it is *vastly more difficult* to try to > > > adapt programs modified to work with systemd in their current state, > > > than it is to *revert* those programs to their pre-systemd state. > > > > You're so certain while so utterly wrong on so many levels it is pretty > > amusing and embarrassing at the same time. You said you don't easily get > > offended, but hopefully you do pickup some learnings here. > > > Did you understand that... > > There are (at least) two paths to take here, and this is referring to > the more difficult of the two. The easier choice is the reversion > then selective upgrade path.
Nope. > I did go on to explain why the first path was more difficult. Did you > consider what I said there? You claimed, you never explained. Ryan analysed, convinced maintainers, convinced other developers, convinced release team. There is a *huge* difference between the two. > Please, put why I'm so utterly wrong into writing here and let's see > what you understand. That is pointless; I don't care what you wanted to prove. Do the same amount of work others have done for starters, then we'll see. -- Regards, Olav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140329020452.gb17...@bkor.dhs.org