Your message dated Thu, 1 May 2014 10:32:40 +0200
with message-id <201405011032.47606.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746496: general: Package upgrade scripts partly fail 
when /tmp is noexec
has caused the Debian Bug report #746496,
regarding general: Package upgrade scripts partly fail when /tmp is noexec
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
746496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: general
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

When /tmp is configured as noexec (for example /tmp in RAM), some scripts
fail on package update.
For example, updating kernel package try to execute scripts in /tmp and in
/etc/kernel/xxx
The first fail (in /tmp), while the other is successful (under /etc/kernel).

This doesn't fail the upgrade globally, just these scripts (for which
execution is prevented by the system) fail.

This doesn't seem to long-term affect the system, but it's not easy for a user
to understand which are the consequences of the scripts failure.

Maybe no package install or upgrade should try to exec scripts under /tmp.

Thanks for considering this suggestion.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Donnerstag, 1. Mai 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Pierre wrote:
> > When /tmp is configured as noexec (for example /tmp in RAM), some scripts
> > fail on package update.
> 
> Don't Do It.
> 
> It will break the system in surprising ways.
> 
> It may look like it is working, but we don't properly support it, as it is
> almost never tested.  Neither by us, nor by anybody else (so third-party
> software is very likely to also choke on noexec /tmp and/or noexec
> $TMPDIR).

I agree, thus closing. (As unsupported + unrecommned: surely you can do it, 
but if you do it, you're on your own.)


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to