Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit : > Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next > gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new > gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version.
For cups, as it doesn't build-depend on libgmp directly, I added the inverse relationship: # libgmp-dev is not GPL-2 compatible before it's 6 release, which makes # it also GPL-2+ Build-Conflicts: libgmp-dev (<< 2:6) Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages > that are compatible? Yes, please. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2156746.eBzsy0u8Yc@gyllingar
