> Yes. But this isn't as bad as you think, because the source > availability requirement exists only if you modify the AGPL'd > software.
I don't think that this is the case. Firstly, because it leaves a practical loophole in the AGPL: -Person A takes some software under the AGPL. -Person A privately gives the new software to Person B under the AGPL. -Person B publishes the new program without source, because they haven't modified it Considering the legal aspects, the rule for verbatim copies only applies to distribution in source form. The 5 options for distributing object form all require offering source in some way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/536aa4ec.8000...@bitmessage.ch
