On Sat, 10 May 2014 15:28:34 +0200, Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote: >I did not make a technical statement about systemd. I understand the reasons >why Tech-CTTE chose it and while I am skeptical about the attitude of some >upstream and Debian developers regarding handling bug reports and feedback, I >am not generally opposed to it. I test drove it for some months some time ago, >before hibernation was broken when it is in use, and mostly enjoyed the test >drive. > >So please don´t use my feedback for any general anti systemd agenda. I am not >opposed to it. But it for it to be default certain criteria are not yet met. >In my eyes partly still open grave bugs and partly the handling or not >handling of them. I wish that systemd upstream developers and Debian packagers >adopt the "never break userspace" mantra of the kernel developers as "never >break applications and application oriented services and if you do take bug >reports seriously". Cause for me systemd is a system component. Yes, it lives >in otherspace, but it is so lowlevel that for me it is part of the system >which provides services to application (just like the kernel does).
+1 I could not have said that any better. Thanks Martin. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wjnb5-0001mt...@swivel.zugschlus.de
