op 07-07-14 14:20, Johannes Schauer schreef: > Hi, > > sorry I attached two wrong files containing the many false positives already > noticed by some of the replies. Here the actual results. > > Sorry. > > cheers, josch
==> llvm-toolchain-3.4_3.4.1-4.arch-all.unusedbd.real <== automake=1:1.14.1-3 autotools-dev=20140510.1 diffstat=1.58-1 doxygen=1.8.7-1 flex=2.5.39-7 lcov=1.10-1 libtool=2.4.2-1.7 patchutils=0.3.3-1 procps=1:3.3.9-5 sharutils=1:4.14-2 tcl=8.6.0+8 texinfo=5.2.0.dfsg.1-3 No, building with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=codecoverage enables at least some of them, and applying patches might require the autotools to be re-run, so I think lots of the requirements are sane. doxygen is probably used for llvm-3.4-doc, so I think it might not be unused either. texinfo probably the same. diffutils, tcl, flex, patchutils, procps could possibly be unused, although not 100% sure. :-) ~Maarten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bd4831.7030...@canonical.com
