On 2014-07-23 01:24:53 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2014-07-22 22:54:55 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I just tried updating testing on my system. I currently use > > sysvinit-core (reasons below), but aptitude is telling me that I > > should remove this in favour of systemd-sysv. Hmm, why is that? > > Well, because the new version of libpam-systemd, 208-6, now depends on > > systemd-sysv rather than systemd-sysv | systemd-shim. > > As you can see with this dependency, you just need to install > systemd-shim. No need to install systemd-sysv! > > The default (systemd-sysv) was just a poor choice from aptitude.
Sorry, I mixed up with another problem that occurred with previous versions. I have no problems on my Debian/unstable machines (libpam-systemd still depends on systemd-sysv | systemd-shim), but I've just realized that the reason is that I temporarily blocked systemd upgrades for another reason. This is probably the best thing to do because seeing how things evolve. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140722233957.gd3...@xvii.vinc17.org
