On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > This is not really relevant. What is relevant, however, is that nobody is > > disputing that libjpeg8 produce higher quality images than libjpeg62 when > > decompressing standard JPEG images. > > If this is true, it is a concern: at least the bitmap editors and image
I meant to write "if this is true *in the general case*... > processing utilities (gimp, imagemagick, etc) would regress on output > quality. > > Are there any examples of this output difference? And I do mean between IJG > libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo, not IJG libjpeg62 and IJG libjpeg8/9. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140809133104.gc8...@khazad-dum.debian.net
