On 10 August 2014 13:38, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > [...] > >> ... and was designed by a larger >> group instead of libswresample which was basically one person (and >> literally appeared in git out of nowhere).
http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=b5875b91113a0f3de6ad61e9ff8b74b81de94760 There was no mailing list discussion and initial bugs had to be discussed on ffmpeg-cvs. It appeared out of nowhere and there was no discussion about the API. Many of the contributors were cleaning the inline asm up or various other fixes or had worked on the original resample code. The comparison you make is highly misleading. On the other hand libavresample was developed by consensus and the API discussed beforehand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cak+ulv4crhyvmfohmdlixdnsmyvezknplqartx3hpr-hkcv...@mail.gmail.com
