Hello, 2014-08-15 16:04 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>:
> I have encountered a situation where the FTBFS bug was caused > by segfault in other package. This has forced me to split opendnssec-doc > to arch:all package (which was good thing anyway), so there are cases > where you want to build the arch:all on most stable and fastest arch. > > Could we just pick amd64 and be done? :) We currently got powerpc or s390x machines producing faster builds than amd64, or would you instead base your arch selection on archive build coverage which amd64 is probably closer to 100% than any other arch. If amd64 was to be picked, what would happen to packages producing arch:all packages that do not build on such architecture? Regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caodfweeabq7nuxldcjd6ce9vaw9jwmzhkkjcnbsch92ugm1...@mail.gmail.com
