Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> writes: > couldn't logcheck get much more clever on a systemd-enabled system? > After all, the priorities are preserved, so everything of priority > "info" or lower could be ignored automatically - and only warnings and > errors considered further. Actually that's one of the reasons why I am > looking forward to running systemd on my servers.
I think that would be good functionality for logcheck to have, but I personally wouldn't turn it on. I really like the more comprehensive log filtering and like seeing every log message that I don't know for certain I don't care about. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87sike20pr....@hope.eyrie.org
