Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I suppose we should always be sympathetic towards such architectures, but at
> the end of the day we should primarily concern ourselves with release
> architectures.
Such as mips?
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Christian Kastner wrote:
> That is the key question, and I believe considering the worst possible
> cost -- a package that cannot be unpacked, as in #757740 -- the
> trade-off is not worth it.
IIRC, I asked last year already to patch dpkg to limit the
xz compression levels to -7 (and treat -8 and -9 as -7).
That was per-arch and mostly with buildd concerns, but this
bugreport shows that it’s high time we do that, as those
little 64 MiB RAM machines are available for a release
architecture (probably several).
Guillem, would you do that?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yes, I hate users and I want them to suffer.
-- Marco d'Itri on gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.11.1409041047400.7...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
