Evgeni Golov <evg...@golov.de> wrote: ["eatmydata apt-get upgrade" propagates to daemons re-started by maintainerscripts ] > While pimping invoke-rc.d sounds like a good idea (and should be done), > I'd prefer the postrm pg_dump that is called from dbconfig-common not to > be executed with eatmydata either. Or with something else that is > preciously hidden in some LD_PRELEOAD.
> My examples were init-specific, yeah. But IMHO this should apply for > everything called via maintainer scripts. Hello, I tend to disagree here. If I use eatmydata apt-get upgrade I will expect that *any* IO-intensive part of the upgrade process uses eatmydata and not just dpkg. OTOH I only do this for chroots, without any important data and without running daemons. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1e8tdb-3i4....@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org